Hari Om Kumar @ Harion Ji v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77101 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2024 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Hari Om Kumar @ Harion Ji S/o Late Sudhanshu Singh R/O- VillBhagwatipur, P.S- Shahpur, Distt- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 364, 387 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons had abducted the informant's brother due to nonfulfillment of demand of extortion money.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that during the course of investigation, the police have not found any incriminating material against the petitioner. There is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77101 of 2024(2) dt.13-12-2024 2/2 independent witnesses, who have supported the prosecution case. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 09.07.2024. The petitioner has four criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the statement of informant's brother under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., was also recorded, and in his statement he has fully supported the prosecution case.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the nature of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 182 of 2024.
7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charges. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T