Badal Dikshit @ Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76913 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Badal Dikshit @ Amarjeet Kumar S/o Rajendra Dikshit @ Rajanrda Ravindas @ Rajendra Das @ Rajendra Ravidas R/o Village- Chano, Ward No. 4, P.S.- Rasulpur, District- Bhagalpur (In FIR address wrongly mentioned as VillageKarwasin, P.S.- Sahar, District- Bhojpur) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 96 of the B.N.S..

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner kidnapped his minor niece.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in a case of kidnapping the victim, who was merely a student of the petitioner. There is no witness to the said offence of kidnapping. Even in the statement of the victim girl under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., she has only stated about an attempt to outrage her modesty but the victim was saved.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76913 of 2025(6) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 Further, there is no medical examination report of the victim on record in order to establish her age etc. The petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of bail on the ground that there is direct allegation in the First Information Report which is supported by the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that there are allegations in the First Information Report against the petitioner supported by the victim's statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No.65 of 2025.

7. However, learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T