Ballam Ravidas @ Ballam Mochi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32861 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2015 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ballam Ravidas @ Ballam Mochi S/o Ramchandra Ravidas, R/o Vill.- Kajeechak, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 383 of 2015 arising out of Hilsa P.S. Case No.247 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused is committing the murder of the son and Daughter-in-law of the Informant by setting them ablaze. Earlier bail application of petitioner was rejected by order dated 09.02.2016 as contained in Annexure-1.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is an old person aged about 55 years. It has been further submitted that there is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 04.06.2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32861 of 2018(5) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 383 of 2015 arising out of Hilsa P.S. Case No.247 of 2015, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U