Md. Danish v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4995 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2022 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
MD. DANISH Son of Md. Nayeemuddin R/V- Belgachhi, P.S- Dagarua, dist- Purnea 2.
Ladli Praveen Wife of Md. Danish R/V- Belgachhi, P.S- Dagarua, DistPurnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate Mrs. Diksha Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2023 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are husband and wife.
Allegation against petitioner no. 1 is of assaulting the informant by Dabia causing injury on his head and as far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, there is no specific allegation against her and further petitioner no. 1 even took Rs.1 lakh from the pocket of the informant which he was carrying and petitioner no. 2 is alleged to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4995 of 2023(4) dt.20-06-2023 2/2 have snatched his mobile.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners and submits that the informant suffered grievous injury on vital part of the body on account of assault made by petitioner no. 1. Considering the submission, the Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioner no. 1. Hence, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
However, considering the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners, petitioner no. 2 above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dagarua P.S. Case No. 262 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T