Sonu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72610 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sonu Paswan S/O Ganesh Paswan @ Ganesh Pasawan Resident of VillageDangraha, P.S.- Majorganj, Dist.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Subodh Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4), 309(6) and 109(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 05.06.2025 at about 9:40 PM, while the informant was returning home and reached near Bhagwanpur Chowk, he was intercepted by three unknown miscreants who fired at him causing fire arm injury on his thigh and thereafter, looted his motorcycle and mobile phone and fled away from the place of occurrence.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R..
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72610 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 2/2 Name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation. Allegation of causing fire arm injury is general and omnibus.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation. Petitioner has got two criminal antecedents of similar nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T