Rajeev Kumar Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74313 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2025 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar S/O Nand Kishor Yadav R/O Village - Lakshminagar (Lulha), Police Station Belhar, District Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Belhar P.S. Case no.206 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 324(4), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the seven named accused persons including the petitioner herein came variously armed and assaulted the informant and others. It is further stated that the petitioner struck the informant with a stone on his head leading to grievous injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is continuing dispute between the parties as they are gotias. The manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74313 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 FIR. The petitioner is in custody since 19.8.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and the corresponding injury has been found to be grievous in nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR together with the contents of the injury report wherein the corresponding injury has been found to be on a vital part of the body and grievous in nature, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months or on framing of charge, whichever is later.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T