Kamlesh Singh @ Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77882 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2024 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Kamlesh Singh @ Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Sharma Son of Late Alakh Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Mahmadpur, P.S. - Naubatpur, District - Patna 2.
Sangeeta Devi Wife of Kamlesh Singh @ Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Sharma Resident of Village - Mahmadpur, P.S. - Naubatpur, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Divya Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. As per prosecution case, informant was subjected to torture and harassment by these petitioners along with F.I.R. named accused person due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Petitioner No. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is mother-in-law of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77882 of 2024(3) dt.22-01-2025 2/2
5. It is submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and they are not concerned with family affairs of the couple. Petitioners are simply victims of over implication. Moreover, thrust of accusation is against husband of the informant. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
7. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against husband of the informant, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P. S. Case No. 70 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T