Md. Tinku @ Waliullah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57107 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -229 Year- 2017 Thana -TATARPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Md. Tinku @ Waliullah, Son of Md. Safiullah, Resident of MohallaBaraichak, Police Station- Tatarpur, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 229 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 120 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is that the son of the informant was killed by the miscreants and his dead body was found near the West Cabin. It further appears that the petitioner is an accused in four other cases. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57107 of 2018 (3) dt.31-10-2018 2/2 charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, moreover the petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2018. Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -VII, Bhagalpur in connection with Tatarpur P.S.Case No. 229 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T