Ghurni Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74704 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2022 Thana- ARER District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Ghurni Devi Wife Of Kishori Roy Resident Of Village - Dhanga, Purbaritol, P.S.- Arer, District - Madhubani 2.

Kishori Roy Son Of Late Mahabir Roy Resident Of Village - Dhanga, Purbaritol, P.S.- Arer, District - Madhubani 3.

Priti Kumari Daughter Of Kishori Roy Resident Of Village - Dhanga, Purbaritol, P.S.- Arer, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for grant of regular bail in connection with Arer P.S. Case No. 28 of 2022 registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the F.I.R., the allegation has been made against the petitioners along with co-accused person is that they used to torture and assault the deceased, namely, Gulab Devi. It is further alleged that on the alleged date of occurrence, they also assaulted the deceased, due to which she died.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74704 of 2022(2) dt.24-03-2023 2/2 submitted from para-11 of this petition that the real fact is that the deceased aged about 70 years and she fell down on the ground while she was walking in the courtyard due to this deceased received injury resulting to her death. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged occurrence and also there is no specific allegation against them. They are languishing in judicial custody since 14.03.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and Considering the fact and circumstances of this case as well as the custody of the petitioners, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Arer P.S. Case No. 28 of 2022 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Madhubani.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T