Indu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16547 of 2023 ====================================================== Indu Devi Wife of Umesh Das, Resident of Village and P.O- Rahimapur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Collector- cum- District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 7.

The Lady Supervisor C.D.P.O. Office, Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 8.

Bindu Devi, Wife of Ganesh Das, Resident of Village and P.O.- Rahimapur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Kumari Amrita ( GP- 3 ) Mr. Mirtyunjay Kr., AC to GP-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. (i) To issue an appropriate order/s, direction/s including a writ preferably in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing the order dated 03.02.2023 passed in Anganwadi Appeal Case No.

26/2020/27/2020-21 passed by the Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur whereby and whereunder he has allowed the appeal in favour of the private

Patna High Court CWJC No.16547 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 respondent directing to appoint her to the post of Sahayika for Anganwadi Centre No.77 situated in Bidupur Block, District- Vaishali.

(ii) To direct the concerned respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of Sahayika in the abovementioned centre who was validly appointed to the post in question."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U