Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74318/2025bail rejected

Kshatri Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74318 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kshatri Yadav S/o- Amla Yadav @ Amlya Yadav Resident of village- Badi Khajuri PS- Kuchaikot District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmveer, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., lodged on 27.06.2025 by the informant Umrawati Devi.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while her husband was returning home, the accused persons armed variously came and allegation against this petitioner is of giving 'Farsa' attack on Vishal Kumar on the order of Lalan Yadav which resulted into injury on the head. The others resorted to assault and as the informant reached there, allegation is that Sugriv Yadav gave 'Lathi' blow on the head causing injury. The locals arrived, they escaped, the injured were taken

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74318 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 to Kuchaikot Hospital and then to Sadar Hospital, Gopalganj. This led to the F.I.R..

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there has been case and counter case, both sides have suffered injuries, the injury of informant has been found to be simple in nature.

5. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP on the other hand opposes the prayer submitting that so far as Vishal Kumar is concerned, the injury inflicted by this petitioner has been found to be grievous in nature and he has criminal antecedent.

6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the report that records the injury has been found to be grievous in nature beside the petitioner having criminal antecedent, no relief can be granted to him.

7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T