Ram Avadh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66566 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2019 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

RAM AVADH RAM Son of Late Tapeshwar Ram Resident of Village-Vari Ishar Tola Dobha, Bharatpura, Police Station-Hathwa, District-Gopalganj. 2.

Vashisht Ram Son of Ram Avadh Ram Resident of Village-Vari Ishar Tola Dobha, Bharatpura, Police Station-Hathwa, District-Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Javed Aslam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No.133 of 2019 registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that the informant Md. Rafique Miya, after parking his Mahindra Pickup van at the door of his friend Sarwar Miya, returned to his house. On the next morning at about 04.00 A.M., the Mahindra Pickup van of the informant was stolen. Before one-two days, both the petitioners along with their 4-5 relatives had come to purchase the aforesaid vehicle of the informant and, on negotiation, the price of the aforesaid vehicle was fixed as Rs.1,85,000/- and Rs.5000/- was given by them to the informant as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66566 of 2019(2) dt.07-11-2019 2/2 advance, Thereafter, they took away the original paper of the aforesaid vehicle of the informant, giving assurance to him that they are coming with the money and after making due payment, they would take away the aforesaid vehicle but, in the meantime, the aforesaid vehicle of the informant was stolen. Due to that reason, the informant raised suspicion against the petitioners and their relatives having their hand in stealing of his aforesaid vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on mere suspicion, both the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case by the informant. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender by them within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Hathua P.S. Cae No.133 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T