Ramchandra Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77715 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2023 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Ramchandra Ram Son Of Lakhendra Ram Resident Of Village- Karneji Vijay Bhumi, Ps- Vaishali (BELSAR Op), Distt- Vaishali 2.
Urmila Devi Wife Of Ramchandra Ram Resident Of Village- Karneji Vijay Bhumi, Ps- Vaishali (BELSAR Op), Distt- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Hemant Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2024 Heard learned cousnel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Vaishali ( Belsar O.P) P.S.Case No. 295 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 was also added.
3. The prosecution case in short is that the informant is son-in-law of the petitioners and he came to his sasural for Bidagiri of his wife ( daughter of petitioners) but the petitioners was flatly refused. In the meantime, petitioners and 2 to 3 unknown persons poured petrol upon him and set fire. During
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77715 of 2023(6) dt.05-03-2024 2/2 the course of treatment informant died on 14.07.2023. 4 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The daughter of the petitioner not supported the prosecution case. The father -in-law and mother-in-law cannot kill their son-inlaw in any manner. The petitioners are in custody since 13.07.2023 having clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail
6. From perusal of the case diary, FIR and also perused the impugned order dated 15.09.2023 and dying declaration of the informant, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners are hereby rejected.
7. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioners within the period of one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if it is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioners may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the Trial Court. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) N.K/- U T