Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74652/2022allowed

Vinay Kumar Ranjan @ Vinay Kumar Rajan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-24Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74652 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2022 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== VINAY KUMAR RANJAN @ VINAY KUMAR RAJAN S/o Indrashan Ram R/v- Masjid Chawk, P.S.- Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, on seeing the police party three accused persons including the petitioner on a motorcycle tried to flee away but on chase they were apprehended. On search, one loaded country made kata, a live cartridge and a mobile were recovered from co-accused Badri Vishal Singh and a live cartridge and mobile were recovered from accused Ajit Kumar. On query, they disclosed that the said motorcycle is stolen one.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74652 of 2022(2) dt.24-03-2023 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from other two apprehended accused persons. Seizure list witnesses are police personal. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 14.07.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJMXVI, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Sarari P.S. Case No. 215 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U