Musafir Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72589 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Musafir Yadav S/O Hansh Nath Yadav Resident of Village - Rajpur, P.S. - Raghunathpur, District - Siwan 2.
Bikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav @ Vikash Yadav Son of Hari Shankar Yadav Resident of Village - Rajpur, P.S. - Raghunathpur, District - Siwan 3.
Rajnish Yadav @ Rajnish Kumar Yadav Son of Shiv Shankar Yadav Resident of Village- Rajpur, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. 4.
Rajan Yadav @ Rajan Kumar Yadav Son of Sanjay Yadav Resident of Village- Narahan, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 303(2) of the B.N.S..
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 12.07.2025, when the informant, along with his son, was going to Lagusa village and reached in front of the house of one Sudama Yadav, in the meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, intercepted him and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72589 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 2/3 assaulted informant and his son by means of axe. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched Rs. 2,150/- cash from pocket of informant, his motorcycle and boring machine.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute, maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72589 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 3/3 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate1st Class, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 192 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T