Daroga Singh @ Daroga Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72000 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2018 Thana- KACCHWA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Daroga Singh @ Daroga Yadav and Anr Son of Late Bhuda Yadav @ Lare Bhud Yadav, 2.

Munna Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Singh, Son of Daroga Yadav @ Daroga Singh, Both are the residents of Village- Niranjanpur, P.S.- Kachhawan, District- Rohtas Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. O.P. Pandey, Advocate Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Satyendra Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that the accused persons pressed the neck of the father of the informant, due to which he died. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 20.08.2018 and have got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72000 of 2018(5) dt.11-04-2019 2/2 implicated in the present case. The petitioners are alleged to have caught hold of the deceased and pushed on the ground. Said act on behalf of the petitioners is said to be the cause of death. From perusal of the postmortem report, it appears that there is no external injury on the body of the deceased except for redness on the neck of the deceased. The said readiness on the deceased is not alleged to be the cause of death. The postmortem report does not corroborate the allegations made in the F.I.R.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Kachhawan P.S. case No.58 of 2018.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T