Sonu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67880 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2019 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan ====================================================== SONU KUMAR YADAV Son of Uma Yadav @ Uma Chaudhary Resident of Village - Chhapiya Buzurg (Bujurg), P.S.- Hussainghanj, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyendra Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2019 in connection with Andar P.S. Case No. 29 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the first information report but his name has surfaced on the basis of the confessional statement made before the police by co-accused Babloo Kumar Yadav which has no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been placed on T.I. Parade till date. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67880 of 2019(2) dt.18-11-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., IX, Siwan in connection with Andar P.S. Case No. 29 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :-

1. One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

2. The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

3. The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U