Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79301 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2023 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== Anil Singh Son Of Umesh Singh Resident Of Village - Harpur Parsa, P.S. - Parsa, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parsa P.S. Case no. 89 of 2023 registered under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the sister of the informant who was married to the petitioner herein was tortured for demand of dowry and was ultimately killed. The accused persons including the petitioner herein who happens to be the husband of the sister of the informant disposed of the dead body.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the reason that he happens to be the husband of the deceased. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79301 of 2023(3) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 allegations in the F.I.R are false and concocted. No such occurrence has taken place as alleged in the F.I.R. The petitioner is in custody since 12.4.2023 and has no criminal antecedent. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R according to which the sister of the informant was done to death by the accused persons including the petitioner herein who happens to be the husband of the deceased together with the manner of disappearance of the deceased not being known, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U T