Saiyad Mansuri @ Syed Mansuri v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4067 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2018 Thana- DAWATH District- Rohtas ====================================================== Saiyad Mansuri @ Syed Mansuri, Son of Rajak Miyan, Resident of VillageJamsona, Police Station Dawath, Distt.-Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 07-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 15.09.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Court (S.C./S.T. Act), Rohtas at Sasaram, in Registered Case No. 190 of 2018, arising out of Dawath Police Station Case No.84 of 2018, registered under Sections 341/323/308/379/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Allegation against the appellant is that in condition
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4067 of 2018 dt.07-12-2018 2/2 of inebriation he allegedly abused and assaulted to the informant. The appellant is in custody since 28.08.2018. The appellant has stated on oath that he has got no criminal. Investigation of the case is already complete. Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 10.12.2018 Transmission Date 10.12.2018