Neha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17433 of 2024 ====================================================== Neha Daughter of Durga Prasad Singh Resident of Opposite Science College, Manjhauliya, Post- Dumri, Police Station- Muzaffarpur Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur, presently working as an Assistant Professor in R.S.S. College, Chochahan, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Bhawan, Budha Marg, Patna through the Secretary.

5.

The Chairman, The Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Bhawan, Budha Marg, Patna. 6.

The Secretary, The Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Bhawan, Budha Marg, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

AC to SC-10 Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-01-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to SC-10 and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar State University Service Commission.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Commission, at the outset, raises the issue of maintainability of the writ application on the ground that result has been published and appointments have been made and in the event if the writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.17433 of 2024(2) dt.03-01-2025 2/2 application is allowed, in that event, one candidate, who has been appointed, shall be ousted, but then necessary parties have not been impleaded as respondents in the writ application. 3.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings and necessary parties. 4.

Permission is accorded.

5.

Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U