Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66603 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282, Year-2018, Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar Gupta, Son of Keji Sah @ Kiji Sah, Resident of Village - Ward No. 1, Rafipur, P.S.- Hussainganj, Distt - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satyendra Rai For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-04-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.
The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Vide order dated 04.03.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66603 of 2019, the petitioner was granted bail in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 282 of 2018 giving rise to Sessions Trial No. 194/2019 to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII, Siwan but inadvertently in the last paragraph of order dated 04.03.2020, in place of Sessions Trial No. 194/2019, the same had been typed as Sessions Trial No. 194/2009.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66603 of 2019(4) dt.17-04-2020 2/2 From perusal of the records, it appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is correct in his submission.
Let in the last line of the last paragraph of order dated 04.03.2020, in place of 'Sessions Trial No. 194/2009', the same be read as 'Sessions Trial No. 194/2019'.
It is further made clear that since there is a lockdown, the petitioner is directed to be released on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. Once the situation comes to its normalcy, the petitioner is directed to comply with the direction of furnishing of bail bonds in terms of order dated 04.03.2020.
The order dated 04.03.2020 is modified/clarified to the extent indicated above.
Let the order be communicated to the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII, Siwan and the competent authority of the State.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T