Khushboo Kumari @ Khusboo Devi @ Khushboo Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76263 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- Charkapathar District- Jamui ====================================================== Khushboo Kumari @ Khusboo Devi @ Khushboo Devi Wife of Ramchandra Pramar (D/o Ranveer Singh) Resident of Gram Maheshwari, PostMaheshwari, P.S.- Sono, Tola- Mahesri Gadi, District- Jamui, Bihar, presently residing at village- Mahadv Simariya, P.S.- Sikandara, District- Jamui, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ansh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Charka Pathar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 61(2), 80(2), 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner alongwith the family members tortured and killed the deceased for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is the sister-in-law (nanad) of the deceased. Learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76263 of 2025(4) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is separate in mess and business and has got no concern in the family affairs of the deceased and her husband. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no direct allegation against the petitioner as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Charka Pathar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T