Jaitu Oraon @ Jeetu Uranw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3190 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4543 of 2023 ====================================================== Jaitu Oraon @ Jeetu Uranw Son of Manglu Oraon, resident of VillageBaghwa, Tole-Nipania, P.O.-Nipania, Via-Banmankhi, P.S.-Barhara Kothi, Distt. Purnea (Bihar)-854202.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Collector of the District (DM), Purnea.

4.

The Union of India through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Home Affairs, New Delhi.

5.

The National Human Rights Commission through its Assistant Registrar (Law), Manav Adhikar Bhawan, Block-C, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi110023. 6.

The Chief Labour Commisioner, Bihar Bhawan, New Delhi. 7.

The Union Territory of Leh and Ladakh through its Commissioner-cumSecretary, UT Secretariat, Leh-Ladakh. 8.

M/s N.K. Gupta Builders Pvt. Ltd. Samyas Hotel, Sakar Leh, (MES/Army Contractor) resident of 338, Sector No. -6, At and Distt-Panchkula, Harayana.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Nath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (Sc8) Mr.Sanjay Kumar, AC to SC-8 For UOI :

Mr.R.K. Sharma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2023

1. The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.4543 of 2023, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 09.10.2023.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court MJC No.3190 of 2023(2) dt.24-11-2023 2/2 that since the counsel for the petitioner was engaged in another Court, he could not appear when the case was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.4543 of 2023 to its original file.

4. The present petition stands allowed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U