Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77290/2024bail granted

Amrit Kumar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-18Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77290 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== Amrit Kumar Pandit S/O Munilal Pandit R/O VILL.-Sisauna Gaiyari P.S and Dist.- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the IPC in connection with Araria P.S. Case no.50 of 2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier approach this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.32350 of 2024 and the same was rejected by an order dated 20.09.2024 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that charges against the petitioner was framed on 20.05.2024, but inadvertently the said fact could not be brought to the notice of the Court when Cr. Misc. No.32350 of 2024 was taken up.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77290 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2

5. The learned APP for the State opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Araria in connection with Araria P.S. Case no.50 of 2024.

7. However, in the event if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after being released on bail is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the trial court would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T