Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73325/2025bail granted

Raubins Kumar @ Rauvinsh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-21Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73325 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-641 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Raubins Kumar @ Rauvinsh Kumar S/O Rama Dhar Yadav Village- Gidarpur Bauri, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Pratima Kumari D/O Late Satyendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Anuan, P.S.- Banshi, P.O.- Anuan, Dist.- Arwal- 804419 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rana Hason, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case no.641 of 2025 registered under sections 64, 115(2), 127(2) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that she was in a love affair with the petitioner for the last 11⁄2 years. On the date of occurrence, the petitioner forcibly established physical relations with her on the assurance that he would marry her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73325 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the F.I.R itself it would transpire that the parties being in a relationship has been admitted therein. The allegation of the petitioner establishing physical relations forcibly is incorrect and denied. It is for this reason that while the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 10.7.2025 and the police station being at a distance of only 1 km, information at the police station was given more than 24 hours later in the late night of 11.7.2025. The petitioner is in custody since 12.7.2025, has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner being in custody for 6 months since 12.7.2025, charge-sheet having been submitted in the case and especially the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case no.641 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73325 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T