Md. Amanullah @ Amanulla v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67629 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-651 Year-2019 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== MD. AMANULLAH @ AMANULLA ,Son of Md. Israil, Resident of Village- Sajjad Colony, P.S.- K. Hat (Sahayak), District- Purnia. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum, A.P.P.

Mr. Pramod Mallik, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-11-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner in the court. Let it be kept on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with K.Hat( Sahayak )P.S. Case No.651 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 147,341, 323, 307, 448, 384,379,504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code .

Accusation against the petitioner is that on 01.09.2019 at about 11A.M. accused persons including the petitioner and 10-12 unknown persons came at the land of the informant and started erecting a wall and on protest made by the informant, accused persons demanded Rs.10 Lacs as ransom and thrashed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67629 of 2019(3) dt.18-11-2019 2/2 him on the ground and putting Gamcha by the petitioner in the neck of the informant started pressing his neck. It was further alleged that the petitioner threatened to kill the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to land dispute and in a civil dispute, colour of criminal offence has been given.

Learned Addl.Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in connection with K.Hat (Sahayak) P.S. Case No.651 of 2019, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) nawalkrs/- U T