Pramila Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24224 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -126 Year- 2012 Thana -KONCH District- GAYA ===========================================================

1. Pramila Devi, W/o Late Badri Pathak,

2. Niranjan Pathak,

3. Vinit Pathak Both Sons of Late Badri Pathak, All R/o Vill.- Tarari, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate Smt. Kiran Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-08-2018 In a case inter alia under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code if the prosecution case was closed without examining the informant and some other witnesses and a petition was filed under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of the prosecution at a subsequent stage and the same has been allowed by the trial court in order to arrive at a just decision of the case, I see no illegality in the order impugned.

2. Accordingly, this application preferred under

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24224 of 2018 dt.31-08-2018 2/2 Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the order dated 25.01.2018 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-IX, Gaya in Konch P.S. Case No.126 of 2012 is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 01.09.2018 Transmission 01.09.2018 Date