← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75004/2025bail granted

Abhinav Singh @ Abhinav Kumar @ Dhanji @ Dhanji Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-20Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75004 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-583 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== ABHINAV SINGH @ ABHINAV KUMAR @ DHANJI @ DHANJI SINGH S/O Late Kamta Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla- Mahabir Asthan Gaurakshani, Ward No.- 12, Police Station- Sasaram Town, District- Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Harendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 583 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 329(4), 324(4), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that petitioner assaulted informant's brother and his family members and also entered into the house of the informant and destroyed articles of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75004 of 2025(3) dt.20-11-2025 2/3 present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case on 15.10.2025. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The injury sustained by the victims are simple in nature. The petitioner side also sustained injury in the said occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 583 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75004 of 2025(3) dt.20-11-2025 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T