← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75144/2022allowed

Sudhir Kumar Choudhary @ Sudhir Chaudhari @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-24Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75144 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2009 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar Choudhary @ Sudhir Chaudhari @ Sudhir Kumar S/O Rupan Choudhary R/V- Mahmuda, P.S.- Khudaganj, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 94 of 2009 registered under section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner along with other coaccused persons is that they abducted the daughter of the informant for the purpose of doing wrong work. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the victim herself went with the petitioner along with his family members for bathing at Rajgir Kund. She further stated in her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75144 of 2022(2) dt.24-03-2023 2/2 statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., that the petitioner confined to her as alleged in a house, but he did not commit any physical wrong with her. The victim further stated that she was being forcefully engaged in the domestic work as a maid by the petitioner along with his family members. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 30.05.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the custody of the petitioner, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 94 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T