Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78958 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-552 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar Singh, S/O Gopal Singh Resident of MohallaLakhi Bagh, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-12-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.552 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 190, 109, 191(3) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The FIR has been instituted based on an information that members of two parties entered into a fight for supremacy on account of a land dispute, wherein some firing also took place and the local people are apprehending danger. The petitioner is said to be one of the persons who was involved in the fighting.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the entire case is based on suspicion of involvement of the petitioner in the crime. There is no specific accusation levelled against the petitioner, rather general and omnibus allegation has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78958 of 2025(2) dt.16-12-2025 2/2 been levelled against four named accused persons and 15-20 unknown persons. In the said occurrence, none has sustained any injury and based on information that some firing took place between members of two sides for their dominance, the present FIR came to be instituted. The petitioner has absolutely fair antecedent and he has no concern with the alleged crime.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the bail application.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and considering the nature of accusation and the fact that the petitioner bears fair antecedent, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.552 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U T