Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75025 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Suraj Kumar, S/o Pappu Singh, R/o Village-Nepura, P.S.-Sahpur, DistrictNawada. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No.105 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111, 317(2), 317(5), 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'B.N.S.') as well as Sections 66, 66-B, 66-C and 66-D of the Information and Technology Act.
3. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and is in custody since 06.07.2025.
4. As per FIR, petitioner was found involved in cyber fraud along with other co-accused persons and upon
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75025 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 police raid, Aadhar Card, A.T.M., Bank passbook, Pan card, etc. along with mobile phone was said to be recovered from his house.
5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that even as per seizure list, Aadhar, A.T.M., Bank passbook, Pan card etc. all appears to be issued in favour of petitioner and it is his belongings but, police has falsely implicated this petitioner on the ground of mobile phone, which was said to be recovered from his possession. It is submitted that the SIM card actually used in alleged mobile was not in the name of this petitioner. While concluding argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is already completed, for which, charge-sheet has already submitted and, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence and moreover petitioner found involved in one more criminal case, where he is on bail.
6. Learned APP opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as alleged SIM card prima facie not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75025 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 appears to be issued in the name of petitioner, which alleged to be used in cyber fraud, coupled with the fact that investigation of this case is already completed, where petitioner remains in custody since 06.07.2025, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Nawada in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No.105 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'CrPC')/under Section 480(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (for short 'BNSS').
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T