Ranjan Chandravanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.636 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2022 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Ranjan Chandravanshi Son Of Suresh Chandravanshi Resident Of Village - Rashoiya, P.S.- Kutumba, District - Aurangabad. 2.

Rahul Chandravanshi Son Of Suresh Chandravanshi Resident Of Village - Rashoiya, P.S.- Kutumba, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner including co-accused persons is that they assaulted son of the informant due to which his son sustained several injuries. It is further alleged that petitioner No-1 fired upon his son but the same did not hit him and they also took away golden chain of his son worth Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.636 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2023 2/3 15,000/-.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case due to previous land dispute. There is case and counter case between the parties. There is no specific allegation of assaulting levelled against the petitioners rather general and omnibus allegation levelled against them. As per injury report, which is annexed with case diary, where it has been shown that the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial custody since 27.09.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioners, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Kutumba

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.636 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2023 3/3 P.S. Case No. 123 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Aurangabad.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Manishkumar/- U T