← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16028/2023dismissed

Shailendra Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-08Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16028 of 2023 ====================================================== Shailendra Kumar Gupta Son of Late Kartik Lal, Resident of MohallaVidyadhar, P.O.- Khagaria, P.S. Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Upper Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division No.-1, Laxmipur (Jamui). 5.

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abinash Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar ( SC- 11 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of direction/directions upon the Respondent authorities for payment of admitted arrears of salary with stipulated interest after taking into consideration the A.C.P.s granted to the petitioner from time to time and also taking into consideration the admissible increments, which the petitioner was entitled to during his entire tenure of service.. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of direction/directions upon the Respondent authorities for payment of admitted arrears of salary with stipulated interest after

Patna High Court CWJC No.16028 of 2023(2) dt.08-04-2024 2/2 taking into consideration the A.C.P.s granted to the petitioner from time to time and also taking into consideration the admissible increments, which the petitioner was entitled to during his entire tenure of service."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondentauthorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U