Dani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74861 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2018 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Dani Yadav S/O Khiru Yadav R/O Vill.- Kodbadih, P.S.- Jhajha, Dist.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanju Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 345 of 2018, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner in an inebriated condition along with other co-accused persons, assaulted the informant and his brother with lathi and tangi. The allegation against the petitioner is that he gave a tangi blow to the brother of the informant, causing serious injuries, and he became unconscious. Other co-accused persons also assaulted the informant and his brother.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74861 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 2/3 submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is a neighbor of the informant and the allegations are false and concocted. The injury report of the brother of the informant falsifies the allegation against the petitioner. Two lacerated wounds have been found on the body of the brother of the informant, and the nature of the injury is stated to be simple and caused by a hard and blunt object. The petitioner has been in custody since 14.07.2025, and he has no criminal antecedent. The charge sheet has also been submitted.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the absence of injury attributed to the petitioner and also considering the submissions of charge-sheet and period of custody, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 345 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74861 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 3/3 conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) Sudhanshu/- U T