Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77583 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2024 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Singh S/o- Manejar Yadav Village- Bargahi PS-Udwantnagar District- Bhojpur At Ara ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shankar Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP.

Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner are said to have assaulted the informant and his niece brutally by means of deadly weapons due to which they sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77583 of 2024(2) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 based on concocted facts. Nothing specific has been attributed against him. Both the parties are co-villagers. The injury sustained by the injured was found simple in nature. Similarly situated co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 05.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 62824 of 2024. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 281 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T