Chandrama Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1611 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2022 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== Chandrama Yadav Son of Ramashankar Yadav R/v- Bhitauli, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 06.08.2022, in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 201 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 25.07.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against 15 unknown persons.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused persons namely Lorik Yadav. He further submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1611 of 2023(3) dt.26-04-2023 2/3 that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and till date no test identification parade was conducted by the prosecution. He further submits that coaccused Lorik Yadav has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.03.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 74300 of 2022 and the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 06.08.2022.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one in which he is on bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 201 of 2022, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1611 of 2023(3) dt.26-04-2023 3/3 reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T