Raj Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75129 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2010 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Raj Kumar Thakur S/o Late Ramashray Thakur R/o Village- Ward No. 13, Gaura, Tola Bishanpur, P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard Mr. S.K. Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 91 of 2010 arising out of Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 280 of 2010 instituted under Sections 20 and 22 of NDPS Act and section 279 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 03.10.2010 by the informant, Kamakhya Narayan Singh.
3. As per the prosecution story, the Police upon information, intercepted a Scorpio vehicle and there is recovery/seizure of 240 kgs of 'ganja'. This led to the FIR.
4. The petitioner submits that the petitioner owns the said vehicle and in that way, he has been implicated.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75129 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 had already preferred a complaint regarding theft of the said vehicle (Annexure-P/3) before the Court concerned after the Police refused to accept the FIR.
6. Learned APP on the other hand opposes the prayer submitting that the seizure is 240 kg. of 'ganja' and the vehicle used that was of the petitioner, the complaint is after the FIR lodged in the present case, the petitioner has criminal antecedent and the last submission is that the FIR is of the year 2010.
7. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the materials on record coupled with the fact that the case is of the year 2010, it would be appropriate that he seek bail.
8. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T