Bajrangi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76221 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2025 Thana- GORADIH District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Bajrangi Yadav S/O Krishna Yadav @ Kishan Yadav Resident of VillageSatjori, Police Station - Goradih, Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 118(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner assaulted him by Khanti causing injury on head while Pushplata Devi snatched his chain and Saheb Yadav took Rs.5,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner and the informant are agnates and are having dispute relating to property. It is next submitted that on the date of occurrence, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other and from the side of the petitioner Goradih P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 came to be instituted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76221 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 against the informant and his side. It is also submitted that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature as pleaded at para 19 of the anticipatory bail application and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature as pleaded at para 19 of the anticipatory bail application, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Goradih P.S. Case No. 126 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T