Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34364 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2017 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Anil Kumar Singh, Son of Late Shiv Shankar Singh, Resident of VillageParsa, Police Station- Majhaulia, District- West Champaran, the then PACS Chairman of Parsa PACS.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner that he misappropriate the Government money as he got the onion and potato of the farmers insured but on enquiry it transpired that names of many of the petitioners were not in the insurance list. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case and an enquiry was also initiated, in which, the allegation was not found true. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34364 of 2018 (4) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM - Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T