Ram Sagar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73146 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2025 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Ram Sagar Paswan Son of Late Ramphal Paswan Resident of VillageRanipur, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna. 2.

Ganga Sagar Paswan Son of Late Ramphal Paswan Resident of VillageRanipur, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna. 3.

Shivji Paswan Son of Late Ramphal Paswan Resident of Village- Ranipur, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna.

4.

Rohit Kumar S/O Ramsagar Paswan Resident of Village- Ranipur, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna.

5.

Pankaj Kumar S/O Gangasagar Paswan Resident of Village- Ranipur, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Ms. Usha Kumari Singh, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 76, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 329(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 10.05.2023, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and his family members.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73146 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, due to a trivial dispute, a simple maar-peet took place between the parties. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has opined the injuries, sustained by the injured, as simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Patna

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73146 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 3/3 City, Patna in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 325 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T