← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67617/2019rejected

Madan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67617 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2019 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== MADAN YADAV Son of Late Jagu Yadav Resident of Village- Sondiha, P.S.- Sarmera, District- Nalanda. At present resident of Village- Kumhra, P.S.- Ghoshwari, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2019 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sarmera P.S. Case No.72 of 2019 registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant, mother of the deceased, named ten persons and alleged that while she was returning after seeing Yagya with her sons on a motorcycle, all the accused persons stopped the motorcycle of her son at the point of pistol. The accused persons dragged Arjun Chauhan from the motorcycle to a ditch and shot him dead.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is of course named in the F.I.R. but no specific allegation of firing is made against the petitioner but it appears

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67617 of 2019(2) dt.05-11-2019 2/2 that all the petitioners having conspired with each other assembled at a place waiting for the deceased who arrived with his mother and brother on a motorcycle and thereafter all the accused persons firstly fired and dragged the son of the informant to a ditch and shot him dead.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid and nature of allegation made against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U T