Rajan Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73236 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rajan Chaudhari S/O Harendra Chaudhari R/O Village- Musahri, Bhagwan Pandey Tola, P.S.- Dhanaha, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Prerna Anand For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 324(4), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of previous land dispute, accused persons intercepted her husband Rajesh on 30.06.2025 at 10.00 A.M. and all the accused assaulted her husband by steel rod, takua and lathi, when informant and Prabhu came to save Rajesh, petitioner assaulted Prabhu by steel rod causing injury on head and Kapildeo snatched her mangalsutra.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73236 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that against the petitioner it is alleged that he assaulted Prabhu by steel rod causing injury on head but then the blow was not repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple and petitioner is not a criminal.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No.210/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T