Sunil Das @ Sunil Kumar Gautam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77594 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-487 Year-2023 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Sunil Das @ Sunil Kumar Gautam S/O Rajdev Das @ Rajdeo Das R/O Village- Batua Tola, P.S- Gurua, Dist.- Gaya. 2.
Santosh Das @ Santosh Kumar S/O Rajdev Das @ Rajdeo Das R/O VillageBatua Tola, P.S- Gurua, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant and his brother brutally due to which they have sustained injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77594 of 2024(2) dt.20-11-2024 2/3 They have falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is totally false and based on concocted facts. Both the parties are agnates and there is admitted land dispute between them. It is further submitted that there is specific allegation of dashing and stopping the bike of the informant against co-accused Saurabh Das. Nothing specific has been attributed against these petitioners. The injuries sustained by the injured were found simple in nature, which is also evident from AnnexureP/2 (series). Learned counsel further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of the injuries sustained by the injured i.e. simple, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Gurua P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77594 of 2024(2) dt.20-11-2024 3/3 No.487 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T