Vikesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74610 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2022 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

VIKESH KUMAR Son of Late Vijay Sahani Resident of village - Belwatiya, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 2.

Rupesh Sahani @ Rupesh Kumar Sahani Son of Late Vijay Sahani Resident of village - Belwatiya, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 3.

Guddi Kumari @ Guriya Daughter of Late Vijay Sahani Resident of village - Belwatiya, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 4.

Arjun Yadav Son of Motilal Yadav Resident of village - Fatgenwa, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, petitioners along with other accused persons, armed with deadly weapons came at the house of informant and started abusing. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant side brutally.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74610 of 2022(2) dt.28-03-2023 2/2 such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is specific allegation against co-accused Savita Devi that she gave knife blow to the informant and her son. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. The injuries sustained by the informant side are simple in nature except injury no.1 of Santosh Sahani which is kept reserved. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the injuries sustained by the victims are simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No.

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T