Ugrah Ram @ Ugrah Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81531 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2023 Thana- BANSHI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
UGRAH RAM @ UGRAH SINGH S/O RAGHUNI RAM @ DHUNI SINGH @ RAGHUNI SINGH @ RAGHUNI KAHAR VILLAGE- MALI, PS. BANSHI, DIST. ARWAL 2.
UGRASEN RAM @ UGRASEN SINGH @ AGRAH SINGH S/O RAGHUNI RAM @ DHUNI SINGH @ RAGHUNI SINGH @ RAGHUNI KAHAR VILLAGE- MALI, PS. BANSHI, DIST. ARWAL 3.
ARVIND KUMAR S/O UGRAH RAM VILLAGE- MALI, PS. BANSHI, DIST. ARWAL 4.
MUNNA KUMAR S/O UGRASEN RAM VILLAGE- MALI, PS. BANSHI, DIST. ARWAL 5.
INDAL KUMAR S/O UGRAH RAM VILLAGE- MALI, PS. BANSHI, DIST. ARWAL 6.
GUDDU KUMAR S/O ARVIND KUMAR VILLAGE- MALI, PS. BANSHI, DIST. ARWAL ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 147,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81531 of 2023(2) dt.18-12-2023 2/3 148, 149, 504, 506, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code but later on Section 302 of the IPC.
3. The allegation against the petitioners is of assaulting the informant and his family members, due to which they sustained injury. It is further alleged that during course of treatment the mother of the informant died.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. They have committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. There is a case and counter case between the parties. Members of both parties have sustained injury as alleged in a separate occurrence. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody since three months.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81531 of 2023(2) dt.18-12-2023 3/3 only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Arwal/Court concerned in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 57 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T