← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73524/2025bail granted

Sumit Kumar Sharma @ Sonu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-19Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73524 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sumit Kumar Sharma @ Sonu Sharma, aged about 35 years, S/o- Devendra Prasad Sharma @ Devendra Sharma Village-Morwa, P.S.-Tajpur, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renuka Ratnakar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 126(2), 308(4), 324(5), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioner along with the other co-accused person have threatened to kill the informant and demanded five percent amount of all the schemes as Rangdari on gun point and they have also abused the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that there is no mention of any specific

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73524 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 demand of property or extortion money only the word rangdari has been used in the FIR. He next submits that name of the petitioner has been dragged in this case due to dirty village politics. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 14.08.2025 and has got only one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for Regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No.134 of 2025. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T