Ramjanam Chaudhary @ Ramjanam Chadhry v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77888 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-583 Year-2023 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== RAMJANAM CHAUDHARY @ RAMJANAM CHADHRY son of Late Munarik Chaudhary Village- Mahuain Ps- kasma Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rupa Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, at teach training college, Shahpur, four thieves were stealing and loading 111 pety marble tiles and 11 box bathroom flush in Pick Up van bearing Reg. No. BR-26K-8116 of worth Rs. 25 to 30 lakhs, after breaking open the locks of the room of informant. Upon information, the police came there and arrested the petitioner along with one other co-accused Sharavan Choudhary.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77888 of 2023(2) dt.05-12-2023 2/2 offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the alleged vehicle. He is a daily wage labour and he was working under the contractor i.e. informant and there was due of daily wage of the petitioner against the informant of Rs. 5000/- and when he demanded his dues amount, then the informant implicated him in this false and concocted case. This case is triable the court of learned Judicial Magistrate. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.08.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with Nagar P.S. Case No.583 of 2023.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T