Sanoj Kumar Sahni @ Sanoj Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76606 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sanoj Kumar Sahni @ Sanoj Sahni S/O Fulo Sahani Village- Pyarepur, Ps. Baligaon, Dist.Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, while the informant was going towards C.S.P. Branch, meanwhile, the miscreants came there and looted cash of Rs. 96,000/- on pistol point which has been kept in dickey of the motorcycle of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named rather his name came into light in this case during investigation. Neither any looted article has been recovered from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76606 of 2023(3) dt.27-02-2024 2/2 conscious possession of the petitioner nor he has been put on TI parade as yet. He has no concern with the apprehended coaccused persons. Similarly situated other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court as well as from another co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Annexure-p/2 series of this petition. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 26.05.2022.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 34 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shubham/- U T