← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74621/2022bail granted

Dharmaraj @ Dharmraj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-02Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74621 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Munger ====================================================== Dharmaraj @ Dharmraj Singh Son Of Manoj Kumar Sharma R/O Vill.- Harpur, P.S.- Shahkund, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 11.10.2022 in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 01 of 2021, F.I.R. dated 06.01.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 504, 509, 448 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant namely, Nitu Kumari has alleged that she is a constable in B.M.P. Dharamraj @ Dharamraj Singh was her classmate he used to cheat the informant in garb of love affairs and took cash from her. When she came to know that Dharamraj is indulge in many criminal activities she denied from giving cash to him and further allegation is that he has threaten to make viral the private photographs of informant on social platform and also sent her private photograph and later full of threaten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74621 of 2022(3) dt.02-05-2023 2/3 and abusive language at her house and her elder sister's house for which legal step is required.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that the allegation against the petitioner is that he has viral the private photographs of the informant on social media but the police has not lodge the case under the Information and Technology Act against the petitioner. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.10.2022.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries two criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits that petitioner is on bail in both the cases as mentioned in Para-3 of the bail petition. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74621 of 2022(3) dt.02-05-2023 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Munger in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 01 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T