Avdhesh Manjhi @ Avadhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76010 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Avdhesh Manjhi @ Avadhesh Kumar S/O Late Prakash Manjhi R/O Village - Budhaul (Hardiya Nagar) P.s.- Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya 2.

Vikram Manjhi @ Vikram Kumar S/O Late Prakash Manjhi R/O Village - Budhaul (Hardiya Nagar) P.s.- Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brijmohan Das, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that he along with his family members went to see a dance programme managed by Akhilesh Manjhi. Further, Akhilesh Manjhi objected why they were seeing the programme for free and thereafter started assaulting Lali Manjhiby spade causing injury on his left hand finger and head. Further, Kamlesh Manjhi, Awadhesh Manjhi and Vikram Manjhi assaulted Anil Manjhi, Karu Manjhi, Satiya Devi and Ushri Devi with Lathi and rod and acted inappropriately.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76010 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assault is against the named accused persons and as far as the instant petitioners are concerned, the allegation against them are general and omnibus.

5. Learned APP opposed the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, abovenamed, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No.247 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T